CaliforniaPeople.org

Proposition

43Two-thirds vote for local special taxes proposed by citizens

Our readToss-up: a legislative deal

Citizen-initiated local special taxes would need two-thirds again. It’s a deal that took a broader anti-tax initiative off the ballot.

MarkdownUse with AI agents
Type
Legislative constitutional amendment (ACA 22, Wicks)
Sponsor
Legislature, as part of a deal with the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
Campaign money
$16.4M yes$10.4M no
Your pick

Key findings

  • It's a deal to avoid something bigger. Legislative Democrats put this on the ballot so the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association would drop a broader initiative. That one would have slashed real estate sales taxes statewide and revoked taxes that previously passed by a simple majority. [1][2]
  • Since a 2017 state Supreme Court ruling (Upland), citizen-initiated local special taxes have been able to pass by simple majority. LA's mansion tax (Measure ULA, 58% yes in 2022) has generated $1.4B since 2023, per the city, and Sonoma's 2024 wildfire sales tax passed with 62%. Neither would have passed under Prop 43's threshold. [1][3]
  • It isn't retroactive, so ULA and similar taxes stay [1]. It applies to new, increased or extended citizen taxes from Jan 1, 2027. [3]
  • Yes $16.4M (business and property-owner committee $15.5M, HJTA committee $0.85M). No $10.4M, $7.8M of it through a labor-sponsored committee. Through Oct 22, 2026. [4]

Track record

Year Event Effect
1996 Prop 218 Special taxes placed by local governments need two-thirds
2017 Cal. Cannabis Coalition v. Upland (Cal. Supreme Court) Opened the door for citizen-initiated special taxes to pass by majority
2022 LA Measure ULA 58% yes; $1.4B generated since 2023
2024 Sonoma County wildfire and emergency services sales tax 62% yes
2026 Prop 43 Two-thirds for citizen special taxes from 2027 on
[3][2]

Money and conflicts

  • The Yes money comes from business and property-owner groups, and most No money from labor [4]. Unions and advocates would lose a tool they've used to pass local taxes by majority.
  • The Legislature traded this for HJTA dropping a broader measure. Its author, Asm. Buffy Wicks, says she is "adamantly opposed" to Prop 43. [1]

Does it solve a lasting problem?

  • It makes the rule the same whether a tax comes from a city council or a petition, and it ends a workaround. It also lets one-third of voters block taxes most voters support. ULA is the test case for both sides: it raised real money, and critics argue it impeded new construction.

If you vote yes: accountability

Bottom line: Starting Jan 1, 2027, a special tax (one with a set purpose) proposed by citizens would need a two-thirds vote, the same bar that already applies when a city council or county board proposes one. [3] Voters lose the majority-vote route that court rulings opened. Taxes that already passed that way stay. [1]

Who's accountable

  • Your city council and county board of supervisors still decide which taxes they put on the ballot, and under what rules.
  • County registrars and city clerks run local elections and report which vote threshold applies to each measure.

What to watch

  • Fights over how a measure is labeled, since a "special" tax needs two-thirds and other kinds don't.
  • Whether groups that used citizen initiatives for local taxes, like LA's mansion tax, shift to other approaches. [1]

Public records to request (CPRA)

Anyone can file a California Public Records Act request (the state's version of FOIA), with no reason required. Agencies must respond within 10 days, or 24 in unusual cases. [5] For any local tax measure, ask your city clerk or county registrar for the petition, the official title and summary, and any legal opinion on which vote threshold applies.

What it does
  • New, increased or extended local special taxes proposed by citizen initiative need two-thirds starting Jan 1, 2027. [3]
  • Fiscal effect: local revenue may grow more slowly; the size is unknown. [3]
Both sides
  • For: HJTA, Reform California, Southern California News Group, SD Union-Tribune. It stops special interests from passing taxes in low-turnout elections. [2]
  • Against: CA Democratic Party, SEIU Local 1000, Sacramento Bee. It lets moneyed interests block tax initiatives most voters support. [2]

Sources 6

2 official3 reporting1 other
  1. ^ a b c d e f CalMatters (Oct 2026) CalMatters Reporting
  2. ^ a b c d CalMatters guide CalMatters Reporting
  3. ^ a b c d e f LAO Legislative Analyst Official
  4. ^ a b SoS, contribution totals (through Oct 22, 2026) Secretary of State Official
  5. ^ First Amendment Coalition, CPRA deadlines firstamendmentcoalition.org Other
  6. · LAist voter guide LAist Reporting