CaliforniaPeople.org

Proposition

5Changes recall elections (no replacement candidates on the same ballot)

Our readLean yes

Recalls would no longer seat a replacement who won with a plurality; the lieutenant governor steps in until a new election.

MarkdownUse with AI agents
Type
Legislative constitutional amendment (SCA 1, Newman)
Sponsor
Legislature; idea from Secretary of State Shirley Weber
Campaign moneyNo committees registered
Your pick

Key findings

  • The 2021 recall of Gov. Newsom cost taxpayers just over $200M ($174M counties, $26M state). He kept his job. [1]
  • Under today's rules, the replacement with the most votes wins, even without a majority. [2] Supporters say a replacement can win with "far less than 50%"; the 2021 recall would have seated someone backed by about 28% of recall voters. [3] (In 2003, Schwarzenegger's 4.2M votes actually topped the 4.0M cast to keep Davis. [4][5])
  • No campaign on either side. No committees registered as of Oct 22, 2026. [3][6]
  • The author, Sen. Josh Newman, was himself recalled in 2018 and won the seat back in 2020. [7][2]
  • The idea came from Secretary of State Shirley Weber. Under Prop 5, a recalled governor would be replaced by the lieutenant governor until a new election (or for the rest of the term, if late in the term). [7][8]

Track record

Year Recall Outcome
2003 Gov. Gray Davis (D) Recalled; Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) won the same-ballot replacement race
2018 Sen. Josh Newman (D) Recalled; won the seat back in 2020
2021 Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) Survived; cost ~$200M
Prop 5 — Removal-only vote; vacancy filled later or by appointment/succession
[2][1][8]

Money and conflicts

  • Democratic lawmakers put it on the ballot. Republican lawmakers voted no, saying it would "dilute the power of the voters" and add special-election costs. [9] Opponents argue politicians, not voters, would pick who fills the seat. [3]

Does it solve a lasting problem?

  • It fixes a real quirk (a plurality replacement), but it also removes the main reason to run a recall, which is getting your candidate in. Supporters call that stability; opponents call it a weaker voter tool.

If you vote yes: accountability

Bottom line: If Prop 5 passes, an official removed by recall would be replaced later, in a special election or by succession or appointment. Who fills the seat, and when, becomes the thing to watch. [8]

Who's accountable

  • The Secretary of State runs statewide recalls and certifies the results. That race (Weber vs. Wagner) is on this ballot, and the idea for Prop 5 came from Secretary Weber. [7]
  • The Legislature would write the details of the special elections that fill a seat. [8]
  • County registrars run the elections and bear most of the cost: the 2021 recall cost counties $174M. [1]

What to ask for

  • A published cost estimate before any separate special election, and a deadline for holding it.
  • Clear rules for who governs in the meantime, so vacancies don't stretch on.

Public records to request (CPRA)

Anyone can file a California Public Records Act request (the state's version of FOIA), with no reason required. Agencies must respond within 10 days, or 24 in unusual cases. [10] Ask your county registrar for its cost reports from the 2021 recall and any later special elections. Counties file these with the state to get reimbursed.

What it does
  • The recall ballot only asks whether to remove the official. No replacement question. [8]
  • The vacancy is filled by a later special election or by appointment. For governor, the lieutenant governor serves until a new governor is elected. The recalled official can run in that later election. [7][8]
  • Cost: unknown; a separate special election could cost or save millions. [8]
Both sides
  • For: Common Cause, League of Women Voters, CA Democratic Party, Indivisible, Sacramento Bee. A recall should be about removal, not a backdoor election.
  • Against: CA Republican Party, Election Integrity Project, Reform California, SD Union-Tribune, OC Register. It protects incumbents and their party.

Sources 11

4 official4 reporting2 reference1 other
  1. ^ a b c AP via KPBS, recall cost (Feb 8, 2022) kpbs.org Reporting
  2. ^ a b c CalMatters explainer (Oct 2026) CalMatters Reporting
  3. ^ a b c Official Voter Guide arguments vig.cdn.sos.ca.gov Official
  4. ^ SoS 2003 Statement of Vote, recall question elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov Official
  5. ^ Wikipedia, 2003 recall results Wikipedia Reference
  6. ^ Ballotpedia News (Oct 26, 2026) Ballotpedia News Reference
  7. ^ a b c d CalMatters CalMatters Reporting
  8. ^ a b c d e f g LAO Legislative Analyst Official
  9. ^ LAist, Prop 5 explainer LAist Reporting
  10. ^ First Amendment Coalition, CPRA deadlines firstamendmentcoalition.org Other
  11. · SoS contributions (no committees as of Oct 22, 2026) Secretary of State Official